Government subsidies in
the airline industry are something that cannot usually be hidden. There are
many airlines who receive subsidies from various different places including
governments. Two long-haul foreign carriers who are said to have received subsidies
are Emirates and Qatar Airways (Jansen, 2015). Both of these airlines are
Persian Gulf carriers, Emirates being from the United Arab Emirates and Qatar,
being based in Qatar. Both carriers are fast growing and have expanded rapidly
into the United States with direct routes to their Middle Eastern hubs. “The advantages have allowed substantial growth in the
last decade despite almost no growth in overall passengers, with Emirates
reaching the top capacity in the world last year, with Qatar 10th and Etihad
13th, according to the U.S. airline argument” Jansen said in his article. Which
goes to prove that these airlines are exceling with their subsidies. Jansen
also mentions that these gulf carriers often get benefits like “interest-free government loans, cheaper access to
airports and services such as fuel and ground handling that are governed by
airline officials” (Jansen, 2015). Therefore three major United States carriers
American, Delta, and United have all began to fight back and have been bringing
these subsides up in court (Jansen, 2015).
Once Gulf carriers came
under fire for them having an interest in government subsides, Etihad Airways
decided it will do its own research against United States carriers. According
to an article by Peter Fricke, Etihad found what it was looking for. According
to Fricke’s article, “American Airlines, Delta Airlines, and United Airlines
have received a combined total of $71.48 billion in government benefits over
the last 15 years” (Fricke, 2015). I can see how Etihad airways could get upset
because if they are getting accused of getting money lets show the truth about
the US carriers, but in the end I am not sure that this will really prove
anything. At the end of the day all airlines get money from the governments and
how they use the money it was really matters.
Foreign carriers have
been able to purchase aircraft for less than market rates mainly because of the
export-import bank here in the United States and a similar program with Airbus
overseas (Drew, 2014). The export-import bank was created part of the new deal
in the 1930s, “which backs loans to foreign companies seeking to purchase goods
and services made in the United States” (Bordelon, 2013). The biggest
beneficiary of these program in the United States is Boeing, and these how
foreign carriers are now involved with this program (Drew, 2014). Using these
bank for carriers like Emirates purchase the aircraft from Boeing, in which
this bank program backs and supports the purchase. According to the article the
biggest user of the program is Irish airline Ryanair, which doesn’t even fly to
the United States, but purchases the Boeing product made in America (Drew, 2014).
Therefore US carriers are buying Boeing products but are not being backed by
the bank because they are not exporting the goods.
Overall I think that the
global playing field for long haul carriers is unfair. I think that the
airlines that choose to fly to the United States should be happy that they are
able to fly to this country. Whether or not these companies get money from
various governments to do so, may be right or wrong. But competition is what
drives the economy and is some aspects it can be good for US carriers as long
as they hold the majority of flights, which they are starting to lose. I think
that this special export bank does need to be revaluated because this is definitely
unfair to US carriers. On the other side if US carriers continue to post these
record profits I would think that they would be able to compete and fly these
long flights as well and make a profit.
References
Bordelon, B. (2013, October 30). Bangladeshi airline
set to receive loan guaranteed by US government. Retrieved from,
http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/30/bangladeshi-airline-set-to-receive-billion-dollar-loan-from-us-taxpayers
Drew, C., & Mouawad, J. (2014, June 27).
Airlines’ Rivalry Amplifies Fight Over Bank Guarantees. Retrieved from, http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/28/business/airlines-rivalry-amplifies-fight-over-bank-guarantees.html?_r=0
Fricke, P. (2015, May 05). Gulf Airline Blasts US
For Aviation Subsidies. Retrieved from, http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/15/gulf-airline-blasts-us-for-aviation-subsidies/
Jansen, B. (2015, March 06). U.S. airlines contend Gulf rivals are
subsidized unfairly. Retrieved from,
http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/flights/2015/03/05/airline-treaties-american-delta-united-emirates-etihad-qatar-gulf/24422137
Your point about the Export-Import Bank I believe to be a valid one. The current system in which it operates allows for other countries to benefit from our government that our own carriers cannot utilize. This system like you said was created in the 1930s and needs to be revamped for the changes in the current society. Additionally, your point pertaining to Etihad Airways finding the 3 major US carriers received substantial money from the government is interesting. I would be interested in learning if that was from the filing for bankruptcy, and for a comparison on the uses of such government subsidies between the US carriers and the Gulf carriers.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that the playing field for long haul carriers in unfair. I think that it is important that the Open Skies Agreement is followed by all countries that are participating. I think you bring up a good point that competition is good for the economy and there does need to be some kind of competition, but it is hard for US carriers to keep up with foreign carriers who are receiving money from their governments to keep expanding and improving their fleet. I agree that there needs to be some sort of change to the Export-Import Bank, but one of the problems that I read about when I was researching all of this, was that the Export-Import Bank really helps support Boeing because of the huge business it has with foreign carriers. If the Export-Import Bank were to be revised, they could potentially lose a lot of business from foreign carriers and these companies will start to go with their competitor. Boeing doesn’t want to lose business so they want to keep the Export-Import Bank around and benefiting them.
ReplyDeleteLike many other, I too find it extremely unfair for cargo pilots and the conditions they must work through. If it were the same rules applied to them as commercial pilots then you would have many pilots looking for jobs that are cargo related. This could probably be a benefit for the industry.
ReplyDelete